Emergency Medical Services Clinicians Research Articles

Removing the barriers to prehospital blood: a roadmap to success.

This review describes the necessity, evolution, and current state of prehospital blood programs in the United States. Less than 1% of 9-1-1 Ground Emergency Medical Service agencies have been able to successfully implement prehospital blood transfusions as part of a resuscitation strategy for patients in hemorrhagic shock despite estimates that annually between 54,000 and 900,000 patients may benefit from its use. The use of prehospital blood transfusions as a tool for managing hemorrhagic shock has barriers to overcome to ensure it becomes widely available to patients throughout the United States. Barriers include 1) current state Emergency Medical Services clinicians' scope of practice limitations, 2) program costs and reimbursement of blood products, 3) no centralized data collection process for prehospital hemorrhagic shock and patient outcomes, 4) collaboration between prehospital agencies, blood suppliers, and hospital clinicians and transfusion service activities. The following paper identifies barriers and a proposed roadmap to reduce death due to prehospital hemorrhage.

Implementing an End of Life Curriculum in a National Cohort of Emergency Medical Services Clinicians

Implementing an End of Life Curriculum in a National Cohort of Emergency Medical Services Clinicians

Emergency Medical Service Attendances for Adults with Repeat Falls in Western Australia: A State-Wide Retrospective Cohort Study

Objectives The risk of falls increases with age and often requires an emergency medical service (EMS) response. We compared the characteristics of patients attended by EMS in response to repeat falls within 30 days and 12 months of their first EMS-attended fall; and explored the number of days between the index fall and the subsequent fall(s). Methods This retrospective cohort study included all adults (> =18 years of age) who experienced their first EMS-attended fall between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2020, followed up until 31 December 2021. Patients who experienced > =1 subsequent fall, following their first recorded fall, were defined as experiencing repeat falls. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify the factors associated with repeat falls; and Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the time (in days) between consecutive EMS-attended falls. Results A total of 128,588 EMS-attended fall-related incidents occurred involving 77,087 individual patients. Most patients, 54,554 (71%) were attended only once for a fall-related incident (30,280 females; median age 73 years, inter-quartile range (IQR): 55–84). A total of 22,533 (29%) patients experienced repeat EMS-attended falls (13,248 females; median age 83 years, IQR: 74–89, at first call). These 22,533 patients accounted for 58% (74,034 attendances) of all EMS-attendances to fall-related incidents. Time between EMS-attended falls decreased significantly the more falls a patient sustained. Among the 22,533 patients who experienced repeat falls, 13,363 (59%) of repeat falls occurred within 12 months: 3,103 (14%) of patients sustained their second fall within 30 days of their index fall, and 10,260 (46%) between 31 days to 12 months. Patients who were transported to the hospital, via any urgency, at their first EMS-attended fall, had a reduced odds of sustaining a second EMS-attended fall within both 30 days and 31 days to 12 months, compared to non-transported patients. Conclusion Nearly 30% of all patients attended by EMS for a fall, sustained repeat falls, which collectively accounted for nearly 60% of all EMS-attendances to fall-related incidents. Further exploration of the role EMS clinicians play in identifying and referring patients who sustain repeat falls into alternative pathways is needed.

Evaluation of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Screening Measures of Emergency Medical Services Clinicians in Urban and Suburban New York During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to assess the psychological impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the self-reported rates of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians in urban and suburban settings that were one of the primary epicenters during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. MethodsAnonymous surveys containing the PTSD Checklist–Specific (PCL-S) were sent electronically between November 2020 and April 2021 to EMS clinicians working in 2 EMS agencies. A threshold score ≥ 36 was considered a positive screen for PTSD symptomology; a score ≥ 44 was considered a presumptive PTSD diagnosis. ResultsOf the 214 surveys sent, 107 responses were returned. The total PCL-S scores suggested PTSD symptoms were present in 33% of responding EMS clinicians (95% confidence interval [CI], 24.1%-42.5%), and 25% (95% CI, 17.6%-34.7%) met the criteria for a presumptive diagnosis of PTSD. Regression revealed increasing PCL-S scores were associated with thoughts of job resignation (+3.8; 95% CI, 1.1-6.4; P = .006), whereas lower PCL-S scores were related to the degree that respondents believed emotional support was available at their institution (−3.6; 95% CI, −6.8 to −0.4; P = .03). ConclusionSixth months after the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, one third of participating EMS clinicians screened positive for PTSD symptoms. Pandemic planning must address the mental health of EMS clinicians to reduce subsequent burnout and maintain a healthy workforce.

Thoracic ultrasound may improve paramedic diagnostic and management accuracy in undifferentiated respiratory distress.

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and congestive heart failure (CHF) exacerbations present with similar history and physical examination findings. This complicates both the diagnostic process and the creation of appropriate treatment plans for patients presenting in respiratory distress, particularly in the prehospital setting. Thoracic point-of-care-ultrasound (POCUS) may increase diagnostic accuracy; however, its potential to improve patient management by emergency medical services clinicians is unknown. We aimed to determine whether a brief thoracic POCUS educational intervention would improve prehospital diagnostic accuracy and treatment plans for patients with COPD and CHF exacerbations. In this prospective pre-/post-study, paramedics completed a thoracic POCUS training program. The pre-test presented history and physical examination data for 10 patients and asked paramedics to diagnose each patient with COPD or CHF exacerbation and to select the appropriate treatment(s). The post-test asked paramedics to interpret ultrasound images in addition to selecting diagnosis and treatment(s). Pre-post differences in average cumulative diagnostic and management accuracy were analyzed using paired two-tailed t-tests. Thirty-three paramedics participated in the study. At baseline, paramedics selected the accurate patient diagnosis and treatment(s) 73% and 60% of the time, respectively. On the post-test, diagnostic accuracy improved by 17% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11-24, p<0.001) and appropriate treatment selection improved by 23% (95% CI: 16-28, p<0.001). Paramedics correctly interpreted ultrasound images 90% of the time. Effective training of paramedics to recognize the clinical scenario of undifferentiated respiratory distress and their associated thoracic ultrasound images may lead to improved treatment plans.

Informal Peer Support and Intentional Acts of Kindness May Attenuate the Impact of Work-Related Stressors on Compassion Satisfaction, Secondary Traumatic Stress, and Burnout of Emergency Medical Services Clinicians

ObjectiveEmergency medical services (EMS) Code Lavender was developed to support EMS clinicians after stressful events via consistent recognition of events, informal peer support, and intentional acts of kindness. This study evaluated changes in burnout screening tool responses of EMS clinicians in response to program implementation and the coincidental start of coronavirus disease 2019. MethodsAnonymous surveys with demographic questions and 2 burnout screening tools were distributed before program implementation (spring 2020) and 20 months later (fall 2021). Analysis included t-tests, Fisher exact tests, and multivariable linear regression. ResultsSeventy-seven preprogram (59% response rate) and 108 intraprogram (88% response rate) survey responses were included. No changes existed between preprogram and intraprogram responses across all subscale scores. Sex was associated with depersonalization subscale scores, with men having scores 1.53 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11-2.95) higher than women. Compared with emergency medical technicians, paramedics had higher compassion satisfaction (OR 3.50; 95% CI 1.79-5.70) and personal accomplishment scores (OR 2.40; 95% CI 1.08-3.71). Transport nurses had higher personal accomplishment (OR 3.29; 95% CI 1.18-5.40), depersonalization (OR 3.73; 95% CI 1.19-6.26), and rates of burnout symptoms (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.09-0.98) than emergency medical technicians. ConclusionThe organizational commitment, peer support, and authentic leadership of EMS Code Lavender may attenuate work-related stressors among EMS clinicians.

Advancing Emergency Medical Services’ (EMS) Response Capability for Behavioral Health Emergencies: Los Angeles County’s Performance Improvement Initiative

ABSTRACT Introduction: Behavioral health emergencies (BHEs) are a common patient encounter for emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians and other first responders, in particular law enforcement (LE) officers. It is critical for EMS clinicians to have management strategies for BHEs, yet relatively little information exists on best practices. In 2016, the Los Angeles County EMS Agency’s Commission initiated a comprehensive evaluation of the 9-1-1 response for BHEs and developed a plan for improving the quality of care and safety for patients and first responders. Methods: A Behavioral Health Initiative Committee was assembled with broad representation from EMS, LE health agencies, and the public. Committee objectives included: 1) produce a process map of the BHE response from the time of a 9-1-1 call to patient arrival at transport destination, 2) identify and describe the different agencies that respond, 3) describe the critical decision points in the EMS and LE field responses, 4) acquire data that quantitatively and/or qualitatively describe the services available, and 5) recommend interventions for system performance improvement. Results: The committee generated comprehensive process maps for the prehospital response to BHEs, articulated principles for evaluation, and described key observations of the current system including: 9-1-1 dispatch criteria are variable and often defaults to a LE response, the LE response inadvertently criminalizes BHEs, EMS field treatment protocols for BHEs (and especially agitated patients) are limited, substance use disorder treatment lacks integration, destination options differ by transporting agency, and receiving facilities’ capabilities to address BHEs are variable. Recommendations for performance improvement interventions and initial implementation steps included: standardize dispatch protocols, shift away from a LE primary response, augment EMS treatment protocols for BHEs and the management of agitation, develop alternate destination for EMS transport. Conclusion: This paper describes a comprehensive performance improvement initiative in LAC-EMSA’s 9-1-1 response to BHEs. The initiative included a thorough current state analysis, followed by future state mapping and the implementation of interventions to reduce LE as the primary responder when an EMS response is often warranted, and to improve EMS protocols and access to resources for BHEs.

Association of midazolam route of administration and need for recurrent dosing among children with seizures cared for by emergency medical services.

National guidelines in the United States recommend the intramuscular and intranasal routes for midazolam for the management of seizures in the prehospital setting. We evaluated the association of route of midazolam administration with the use of additional benzodiazepine doses for children with seizures cared for by emergency medical services (EMS). We conducted a retrospective cohort study from a US multiagency EMS dataset for the years 2018-2022, including children transported to the hospital with a clinician impression of seizures, convulsions, or status epilepticus, and who received an initial correct weight-based dose of midazolam (.2 mg/kg intramuscular, .1 mg/kg intravenous, .2 mg/kg intranasal). We evaluated the association of route of initial midazolam administration with provision of additional benzodiazepine dose in logistic regression models adjusted for age, vital signs, pulse oximetry, level of consciousness, and time spent with the patient. We included 2923 encounters with patients who received an appropriate weight-based dose of midazolam for seizures (46.3% intramuscular, 21.8% intranasal, 31.9% intravenous). The median time to the first dose of midazolam from EMS arrival was similar between children who received intramuscular (7.3 min, interquartile range [IQR] = 4.6-12.5) and intranasal midazolam (7.8 min, IQR = 4.5-13.4) and longer for intravenous midazolam (13.1 min, IQR = 8.2-19.4). At least one additional dose of midazolam was given to 21.4%. In multivariable models, intranasal midazolam was associated with higher odds (odds ratio [OR] = 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.10-1.76) and intravenous midazolam was associated with similar odds (OR = 1.00, 95% CI = .80-1.26) of requiring additional doses of benzodiazepines relative to intramuscular midazolam. Intranasal midazolam was associated with greater odds of repeated benzodiazepine dosing relative to initial intramuscular administration, but confounding factors could have affected this finding. Further study of the dosing and/or the prioritization of the intranasal route for pediatric seizures by EMS clinicians is warranted.

Adverse Effects After Prehospital Administration of Naloxone by Bystanders: A Preliminary Study.

Opioid use disorder is a cause of significant morbidity and mortality. In order to reverse opioid overdose as quickly as possible, many institutions and municipalities have encouraged people with no professional medical training to carry and administer naloxone. This study sought to provide preliminary data for research into the rates of adverse effects of naloxone when administered by bystanders compared to Emergency Medical Services (EMS) personnel, since this question has not been studied previously. This was a retrospective cohort study performed at an urban, tertiary, academic medical center that operates its own EMS service. A consecutive sample of patients presenting to EMS with opioid overdose requiring naloxone was separated into two groups based on whether naloxone was administered by bystanders or by EMS personnel. Each group was analyzed to determine the incidence of four pre-specified adverse events. There was no significant difference in the rate of adverse events between the bystander (19%) and EMS (16%) groups (OR = 1.23; 95% CI, 0.63 - 2.32; P = .499) in this small sample. Based on these initial results, a study would need a sample size of 6,188 in order to reach this conclusion with 80% power. Similarly, there were no significant differences in the rates of any of the individual adverse events. Secondary analysis of patients' demographics showed differences between the two groups which generate hypotheses for further investigation of disparities in naloxone administration. This preliminary study provides foundational data for further investigation of naloxone administration by bystanders. Adverse events after the prehospital administration of naloxone are rare, and future studies will require large sample sizes. These preliminary data did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in adverse event rates when comparing naloxone administration by bystanders and EMS clinicians. This study provides data that will be useful for conducting further research on multiple facets of this topic.

Rural Emergency Medical Services Clinicians’ Perceptions and Preferences in Receiving Clinical Feedback From Hospitals: A Qualitative Needs Assessment

Objective Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians experience dissatisfaction with the quality and quantity of clinical feedback from hospitals. Satisfaction is further diminished by the lack of a standardized systems approach. The purpose of this study was to identify rural clinicians’ perceptions and preferences regarding clinical feedback received from hospitals, the delivery mechanisms, and its impact on their relationships with health care organizations. Methods This was a qualitative study focused on EMS clinicians involved in rural prehospital care at a single Midwestern academic medical center. Using a phenomenological framework, semi-structured interviews were conducted with medical directors, service directors, fire captains, air medical personnel, emergency medical responders, emergency medical technicians, advanced emergency medical technicians, and paramedics, all of whom were selected through purposive sampling. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and independently coded by two trained reviewers. Results Twenty participants (11 frontline clinicians and 9 administrative staff members) with a wide range of clinical experience from 14 air and ground EMS agencies were interviewed. Emerging themes included: (1) the value or usefulness of feedback; (2) desired feedback system characteristics; (3) barriers to receiving feedback; (4) utilization and application of feedback; and (5) the feedback’s impact on the relationship with health care organizations. Participants felt that clinical feedback from hospitals was especially important as a method of improving quality of care, though was rarely provided. Professional development was seen as a major benefit of receiving clinical feedback from hospitals. Conclusion Our results suggest that consistent clinical feedback provided by hospitals was valued. Establishing a culture of providing organized feedback to practicing rural EMS clinicians is important for professional development and can strengthen the relationships between EMS clinicians and hospitals. These study findings can assist in the development and implementation of a standardized feedback instrument to benefit rural EMS clinicians, patients, and the health care system as a whole.

Supporting Emergency Medical Services Clinicians Through Acute and Sustained Crises With Informal Peer Support and Intentional Acts of Kindness: The Emergency Medical Services Code Lavender Program

ObjectiveGiven the recommendations against the use of critical incident stress debriefing, the emergency medical services (EMS) Code Lavender program was created as a mechanism to consistently recognize and reach out to EMS clinicians after acute crisis events, offer nonintrusive informal peer support and acts of kindness, and provide stepwise support via mental health professionals as needed. The study aimed to assess program utilization and evaluate the program's impact on EMS clinicians’ perceptions of support and resources available to them after an acute crisis event. MethodsAnonymous surveys were distributed before program implementation and 18 months later. Program utilization was tracked using REDCap (Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN). Fisher exact tests and logistic regression were used to analyze the survey results. ResultsWithin 30 months, 87 referrals were made. Seventy-seven preprogram (59% response rate) and 104 intraprogram (88% response rate) surveys were collected. There were no differences between respondents by sex or role. There were significant improvements in knowing where to go for help (from 40% to 85%, P < .001) and willingness to seek help if needed (from 40% to 59%, P = .02). ConclusionThe implementation of an EMS Code Lavender program led to significant increases in EMS clinician self-reported knowledge of where to go and willingness to seek help after acute crisis events.

Understanding the Role of Empathy and Gender on EMS Clinician Occupational Stress and Mental Health Outcomes

Background Emergency Medical Service (EMS) clinicians experience high levels of occupational stress due to long hours, short staffing, and patient deaths, among other factors. While gender has been partially examined, little is known regarding the role of empathy on occupational stress and mental health (MH) outcomes among EMS clinicians. Therefore, the current study examines the moderating role of empathy and, separately, gender on associations between occupational stress and mental health. Methods A cross-sectional examination of EMS clinician occupational and personal wellbeing was conducted via an anonymous, electronic survey. Information on clinician demographics, and validated measures of occupational stress, burnout, and MH outcomes were collected. Empathy was assessed using the Toronto Empathy Scale (TEQ). Descriptive/bivariate statistics were conducted for variables of interest. Separate multivariable regression models evaluated associations between occupational stress and mental health outcomes. Empathy and gender were examined as potential moderators using interactions. Results A total of 568 EMS clinicians completed the survey. High levels of mental health difficulties were reported (34.0% anxiety, 29.2% depression, 48.6% burnout). Increased occupational stress was associated with increased anxiety (OR =1.08, 95% CI 1.05-1.10), depression (OR = 1.09, 95% CI 1.06-1.10), and burnout (OR = 1.10, 95% CI 1.07-1.12). No moderation analyses were significant. Greater resilience was associated with lower depression, anxiety, and burnout. Conclusion EMS clinicians, much like other first responders, experience considerable occupational stress, of which is associated with mental health difficulties and burnout. Findings underscore the need for intervention programs aimed at reducing the impact of occupational stress and the promotion of resilience. Continuing to understand the full scope of EMS mental health, including the role of resilience, is imperative, particularly in light of future public emergencies.

The Female Emergency Medical Services Experience: A Mixed Methods Study

Background Emergency Medical Services (EMS) is a challenging profession. Little is known if there are gender differences in the experiences among EMS clinicians. Therefore, our aim was to understand and characterize the occupational experiences of female EMS clinicians. Methods A mixed methodological study was conducted among currently licensed female EMS clinicians via focus group and self-report survey data. Three focus groups (n = 5, 4, 13, respectively) were conducted with participants purposively recruited from primarily Northeastern EMS agencies. Through ongoing collaborations, a recruitment advertisement was provided to EMS leadership at respective agencies for distribution among their female staff. Sessions were recorded and transcribed for thematic analysis. A six-phase inductive analytical approach was utilized to evaluate focus group data. Qualitative findings were utilized to inform a cross-sectional, self-report survey consisting of occupational specific experiences, such as harassment and pregnancy, and validated measures of mental wellbeing. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the study sample and female EMS clinician occupational and personal experiences. Results A total of 22 female EMS clinicians participated across the three focus group sessions. Four major themes were identified: 1) the female EMS experience; 2) impact on personal wellbeing; 3) impact on occupational wellbeing; and 4) coping mechanisms. Each theme had multiple subthemes. There were 161 participants that attempted the 72-item survey, 13 partial and 148 competed surveys. Median age was 32 years (IQR: 25-42), and the majority were EMT-Bs (55.1%). Approximately 70.0% met the criteria for probable anxiety, 53.9% probable depression and 40.9% elevated symptoms of burnout. Almost 73.0% reported workplace harassment, with most experiences being perpetrated by patients and coworkers. Over 61.0% reported reconsideration of their career in EMS. Overall, survey data indicated interactions with peers and leadership, and social support were positive. Conclusions Findings highlight the need to improve the occupational experiences of female EMS clinicians to preserve and encourage the continuation of their participation in this workforce. Specifically tailored interventions aimed at protecting and improving their overall wellbeing are critical, particularly considering the increased occupational burden resulting from the pandemic. Future research should aim to understand specific predictors of adverse mental health outcomes among this population.

Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians' views on EMS-delivered interventions to promote secure firearm storage practices.

Lethal means safety counseling (LMSC) to promote secure firearm storage may reduce the risk of firearm-involved deaths, including suicide. We examined if emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians, including emergency medical technicians and paramedics, may be suitable LMSC messengers. We conducted a web-based survey of 229 US EMS clinicians. While few EMS clinicians supported EMS-delivered LMSC to all patients (17.0%), most supported EMS-delivered LMSC to patients in an acute suicidal crisis (64.2%) or with a known suicide attempt history (55.9%). Barriers to EMS-delivered LMSC included lack of training (73.4%), perceptions that LMSC is outside EMS clinicians' scope of practice (58.1%), and lack of standard operating procedures (56.3%). Most reported at least some interest in receiving training on EMS-delivered LMSC (67.7%). Participants holding more accurate beliefs about the link between firearm storage practices and suicide risk, as well as the efficacy of LMSC, were more likely to support EMS-delivered LMSC across patient scenarios (ORs = 2.18-5.21, ps <0.01) and express interest in receiving LMSC training (ORs = 3.78-5.43, ps <0.001). Given that many EMS clinicians interface with patients at elevated suicide risk, targeted LMSC training may be strategic; however, research is needed to determine if and how EMS clinicians might be viable LMSC messengers.

E-FAST Ultrasound Training Curriculum for Prehospital Emergency Medical Service (EMS) Clinicians.

Audience and type of curriculum: This hybrid, asynchronous curriculum is designed for prehospital clinician colleagues, including but not limited to emergency medical technicians (EMT), advanced EMTs (AEMT), EMT-paramedics (EMT-P), critical care EMT-Ps (CCEMTP), critical care transport nurses (CCTN), and certified flight registered nurses (CFRN) to learn and practice ultrasound fundamentals in the setting of a standardized extended focused assessment with sonography in trauma (E-FAST) exam. Over a five-month curriculum, learners will perform a pre-test, review online module lectures, attend an ultrasound scanning workshop, and perform post-test examinations. The extended-focused assessment with sonography in trauma (E-FAST) exam can identify intrathoracic and intraabdominal free fluid, as well as pneumothoraces. The E-FAST ultrasound exam has previously been taught to clinicians of various backgrounds in healthcare including emergency medical service (EMS). However, an open-access, systemized curriculum for teaching E-FAST exams to EMS clinicians has not been published. By the end of these training activities, prehospital EMS learners will be able to demonstrate foundational ultrasound skills in scanning, interpretation, and artifact recognition by identifying pertinent organs and anatomically relevant structures for an E-FAST examination. Learners will differentiate between normal and pathologic E-FAST ultrasound images by identifying the presence of free fluid and lung sliding. Learners will also explain the clinical significance and application of detecting free fluid during an E-FAST scan. The educational strategies used in this curriculum include a hybrid, asynchronous curriculum encompassing 2.5 hours of lectures derived from online learning modules and in-person review. In addition, learners will attend 2 hours of hands-on proctored ultrasound scanning practicing E-FAST examinations. An online 13-question pre-test was administered prior to the study. An online post-test and in-person scanning OSCEs were administered at least eight weeks after their scheduled workshop consisting of an online 13-question multiple-choice post-test, a confidence survey, and a hands-on E-FAST Objectively Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE) session. A non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed between each pre-test and post-test metric to examine the statistical differences of paired data. Post-test scores demonstrated statistically significant improvement in both image interpretation exams and ultrasound self-efficacy from the pre-test. The mean pre-test and post-test scores were 55.46% (7.21 ± 1.99) and 84.23% (10.89 ± 1.59) correct out of 13 questions, respectively (p < 0.0001). Participants surveyed an increase in self-efficacy reflected by a Likert scale for ultrasound usage and image interpretation (p < 0.005). The average post-test OSCE E-FAST exam score was 37.89 ± 2.76 out of 42 points (90.21%). This 4.5-hour hybrid asynchronous model demonstrates an effective curriculum for teaching E-FAST ultrasound to prehospital clinicians. Ultrasound, sonography, prehospital clinicians, emergency medical services (EMS), paramedics, critical care transport, extended focused assessment with sonography in trauma (E-FAST), free fluid, sliding lung sign, elective, pain.

Assessing burnout rates and contributing factors in emergency medical services clinicians

Background Burnout is costly to the healthcare system and is associated with medical error, absenteeism, and attrition. Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians endure numerous stressors that predispose them to experience burnout. Methods An instrument was administered to licensed EMS clinicians recruited from 16 services across Massachusetts. The anonymous survey consisted of demographics, the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) instrument, and 5-possibility Likert scales. Prevalence ratios were calculated to determine which demographic qualities and burnout-related factors were associated with increased CBI scores. Results In total, 386 EMTs were surveyed (62.2% male). The survey response rate was 21.4%. The mean CBI was 52.97 (SD 17.88). A positive burnout screen (CBI score = >50) was calculated for 55.4% of respondents. Respondents most often reported that inadequate compensation (87.5%) and high call volume (79.2%) contributed to perceived stress at work. Factors most associated with positive burnout screening amongst respondents were inadequate compensation (PR 5.8, CI 2.52–12.38, p < 0.001) and inadequate opportunity to process trauma (PR 2.88, CI 2.14–3.87, p < 0.001). Conclusion Over half of the surveyed EMS population suffers from burnout, based on the CBI assessment tool. Factors contributing most to positive burnout screening include inadequate compensation and lack of opportunity to process trauma.

Barriers and facilitators to burn first aid practice in the prehospital setting: A qualitative investigation amongst emergency medical service clinicians

First aid cooling for burn injuries improves re-epithelialisation rates and reduces scarring. The objective of this research was to explore and describe barriers and facilitators to the provision of optimal first aid for acute burn patients in the prehospital setting. Emergency medical service (EMS) clinicians in Queensland were invited via email to participate in a survey designed to assess experience, knowledge, and attitudes regarding provision of optimal burn first aid in the prehospital setting (N = 4500). Barriers and facilitators to administering optimal first aid in the prehospital environment were assessed via two open-ended questions with free-text response boxes. An inductive approach to qualitative content analysis was used to analyze free-text data. In total, we included 326 respondents (7.2% response rate). Responses (n = 231) regarding barriers to first aid were classified into 12 categories, within five overarching dimensions. The most common of these was identified as pain. Similarly, free text responses (n = 276) regarding facilitators of burn first aid formed eight dimensions with 21 subcategories – most commonly fast and effective pain relief. Factors influencing burn first aid provision in the prehospital setting were wide-ranging and varied, with pain identified as the most prominent.

Situation awareness in Sweden’s emergency medical services: a goal-directed task analysis

Situation awareness is knowing what is going on in the situation. Clinicians working in the emergency medical services (EMS) encounter numerous situations in various conditions, and to be able to provide efficient and patient safe care they need to understand what is going on and possible projections of the current situation. The design of this study encompassed a Goal-Directed Task analysis where situation awareness information requirements were mapped in relation to goals related to various aspects of the EMS mission. A group of 30 EMS subject matter experts were recruited and answered a web-based survey in three rounds related to what they though themselves or a colleague might need to achieve situation awareness related to the specific goals of various situations. The answers were analysed using content analysis and descriptive statistics. Answers reached consensus at a predetermined level of 75%. Those who reached consensus were entered into the final goal-directed task analysis protocol. The findings presented that EMS clinicians must rely on their own, or their colleagues prior experience or knowledge to achieve situation awareness. This suggests that individual expertise plays a crucial role in developing situation awareness. There also seems to be limited support for situation awareness from organizational guidelines. Furthermore, achieving situation awareness also involves collaborative efforts from the individuals involved in the situation. These findings could add to the foundation for further investigation in this area which could contribute to the development of strategies and tools to enhance situation awareness among EMS clinicians, ultimately improving patient care and safety.

Epidemiology of Emergency Medical Services-Attended out-of-Hospital Deliveries and Complications in the United States

Background Prehospital obstetric events, including out-of-hospital deliveries and their complications, are a rare but high-risk event encountered by emergency medical services (EMS). Understanding the epidemiology of these encounters would help identify strategies to improve prehospital obstetric care. Our objective was to determine the characteristics of out-of-hospital deliveries and high-risk complications treated by EMS clinicians in the U.S. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of EMS patient care records in the 2018 and 2019 National EMS Information System Public Release Version 3.4 datasets. We included EMS activations after a 9-1-1 scene response for patients aged 12–50 years with evidence of an out-of-hospital delivery or delivery complication, or where the patient was a newborn aged 0-<6 h. We examined patient, community, emergency response, and clinical characteristics using descriptive statistics. Results Of the 56,735,977 EMS activations included in the 2018 and 2019 datasets, there were 8,614 out-of-hospital deliveries, 1,712 delivery complications, and 5,749 records for newborns. Most maternal (76%) out-of-hospital deliveries involved patients between the ages of 20–34 years, occurred on a weekday (73%), were treated by an advanced life support crew (85%), and occurred in a home or residence (73%). EMS-assisted field delivery was documented in 3,515 (34%) of all maternal activations but only 2% of activations with a delivery complication. Few patients received an EMS-administered medication (e.g., 0.4% received oxytocin). Supplemental oxygen was administered in 870 (15%) of newborn activations. Activations from counties with the most racial/ethnic diversity were more often treated by a BLS-level unit (16% vs. 12%, p < 0.001), and activations from rural areas had significantly longer transport times (19.7 min [IQR 8.7, 32.8] vs. urban, 13.1 min [IQR 8.7, 19.7], p < 0.001). Conclusion In this large, national repository of EMS patient care records from across the U.S., most activations for out-of-hospital delivery, delivery complication, or a newborn included only routine EMS care. There were potential disparities in level of care, clinical care provided, and measures of access to definitive care based on maternal and community factors. We also identified gaps in current practice, such as for postpartum hemorrhage, that could be addressed with changes in EMS clinical protocols and regulations.

Opportunistic identification of atrial fibrillation during unscheduled contact with emergency ambulance services in England: a qualitative exploration

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an important risk factor for stroke which commonly affects people attended by Emergency Medical Services (EMS). There may be an opportunity for. EMS clinicians to find new incidental cases of AF suitable for oral anticoagulation (OAC) amongst the population who do not require conveyance to hospital following urgent ambulance review. Purpose This study explored whether it was acceptable to propose a formal pathway for identification and subsequent referral of non-conveyed EMS patients with incidental AF to their general practitioner (GP) for consideration of OAC prescription. The perspectives of patients, paramedics, and field experts were included. Methods This qualitative study included four online focus groups involving 18 members of the public and one-to-one online interviews in England with 11 health care and service providers (6 paramedics, 5 field experts providing multiple expertise in cardiology, general practice, public health, academic research, healthcare policy, and primary care commissioning) between June and September 2022. A semi-structured topic guide was used, with purposive sampling to maximise the diversity of perspective and experience in all participant groups. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed anonymously and analysed thematically. Results All participant groups supported formalising the opportunistic detection of AF during EMS review, but each had concerns and caveats. Of paramount concern to all groups was that any change in practice must not create delays in the emergency response system since incidental AF is non-urgent and other community pathways are in place for detection and management. Public participants were also concerned about how the diagnosis would be communicated to the patient, and opinion was split between whether this should be ‘on the scene’ or in a subsequent GP appointment. Paramedics reported that they frequently identify incidental AF, but that there is variation in practice regarding whether (and how) this is communicated to the GP. There was a concern that the finding of AF was not easily visible within the existing EMS report and may be missed. Paramedics also focussed on safety-netting of patients not being conveyed to hospital and of a need for an ‘active’ reporting process to ensure that the finding of AF was acted upon. In general, field experts felt that a formal pathway would be useful but relatively low impact, and favoured a simple intervention that did not overly complicate existing AF pathways. Conclusions There is support amongst the public and professionals for the development of a formal pathway to ensure ongoing follow-up and care for people with AF incidentally detected in the community by EMS. This novel case finding opportunity has the potential to improve AF detection, oral anticoagulation rates, and reduce the risk of stroke.